Share
Curbing the Court: Why the Public Constrains Judicial Independence
Brandon L. Bartels
(Author)
·
Christopher D. Johnston
(Author)
·
Cambridge University Press
· Hardcover
Curbing the Court: Why the Public Constrains Judicial Independence - Bartels, Brandon L. ; Johnston, Christopher D.
Choose the list to add your product or create one New List
✓ Product added successfully to the Wishlist.
Go to My Wishlists
Origin: Spain
(Import costs included in the price)
It will be shipped from our warehouse between
Thursday, July 11 and
Thursday, July 18.
You will receive it anywhere in United Kingdom between 1 and 3 business days after shipment.
Synopsis "Curbing the Court: Why the Public Constrains Judicial Independence"
What motivates political actors with diverging interests to respect the Supreme Court's authority? A popular answer is that the public serves as the guardian of judicial independence by punishing elected officials who undermine the justices. Curbing the Court challenges this claim, presenting a new theory of how we perceive the Supreme Court. Bartels and Johnston argue that, contrary to conventional wisdom, citizens are not principled defenders of the judiciary. Instead, they seek to limit the Court's power when it suits their political aims, and this inclination is heightened during times of sharp partisan polarization. Backed by a wealth of observational and experimental data, Bartels and Johnston push the conceptual, theoretical, and empirical boundaries of the study of public opinion of the courts. By connecting citizens to the strategic behavior of elites, this book offers fresh insights into the vulnerability of judicial institutions in an increasingly contentious era of American politics.
- 0% (0)
- 0% (0)
- 0% (0)
- 0% (0)
- 0% (0)
All books in our catalog are Original.
The book is written in English.
The binding of this edition is Hardcover.
✓ Producto agregado correctamente al carro, Ir a Pagar.
